| Click Here to receive daily reports of the TOP PICKS OR your personal stock choices | STOCKCHASEWhat the experts are saying! |
| There are 2 registered members and 30 guests viewing the site. | Follow us on Twitter | Tweet | Rss Top Picks Feed | Rss Daily Feed |
StockResearchPortal.com |
|
| PAST TOP PICK | 44.980 | Brian Acker, CA | (A Top Pick Oct 17/06. Up 40.2%.) Acquired by its parent. | 2007-10-10 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 44.980 | Brian Acker, CA | (A Top Pick Oct 17. Up 40.2%.) Was acquired by its parent. | 2007-08-30 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 44.980 | Brian Acker, CA | (A Top Pick Oct 17/06. Up.) Was acquired. | 2007-06-21 | |
| Comment | 44.980 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Has been taken over by Royal Dutch. If you own, tender your shares for the $45. | 2007-05-09 | |
| Comment | 44.850 | Bill Harris, CFA | Being taken over high its parent. There could be a shot at a higher bid will be made, but he feels it is actually finished. | 2007-04-13 | |
| HOLD | 44.530 | Laura Wallace | The parent, Royal Dutch, has raised their offer to $45. Her strategy on these is to wait until the last moment, as you can never tell what else may occur. | 2007-03-14 | |
| Comment | 44.620 | Gavin Graham | Its parent, Royal Dutch, has raised their offer to $45. Feels it is worth more. | 2007-03-06 | |
| HOLD | 44.630 | Brendan Caldwell | Parent company, Royal Dutch, is taking it over. Would recommend tendering your stock. | 2007-02-27 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 44.900 | Brian Acker, CA | (A Top Pick Oct 17/06. Up 41%.) Had been woefully mispriced at $32. No longer mispriced. Sold his holdings. | 2007-02-01 | |
| Comment | 43.020 | John Stephenson | Being acquired by Royal Dutch Shell. | 2007-01-05 | |
| HOLD | 43.600 | Bill Harris, CFA | Parent company, Royal Dutch is taking it over. You can either tender your shares and receive dividends at 3.5% or sell your stock. Royal Dutch is a pretty good company. | 2006-12-22 | |
| SELL | 43.620 | Bruce Campbell | Being acquired by the parent, Royal Dutch. Doesn’t expect there will be other offers, so would take your money. | 2006-12-21 | |
| SELL | 43.500 | David Taylor, MBA, CFA | All the juice is out of it after the parent bid it up. | 2006-12-18 | |
| HOLD | 43.450 | Norman Levine | Trading higher than what Shell International has offered because investors don’t believe it will be successful getting it at the lower price. Could come back in the $45 area. | 2006-12-05 | |
| BUY | 43.350 | Paul Harris, CFA | Very comfortable with oil and feel oil is going to go higher in 2007. He prefers Suncor (SU-T) and CNQ (CNQ-T). This company will continue to do well. | 2006-11-30 | |
| SELL | 42.680 | Peter Brieger | There are cheaper and more interesting plays. This and other companies are under a cloud based on the falling out of favour oil sands related securities. Expensive. | 2006-11-29 | |
| SELL | 42.750 | Michael Decter | Royal Dutch Shell, has offered to buy outstanding shares. He is inclined to think there won't be a better offer. The next possible takeover would be Imperial Oil (IMO-T) by its parent. Consider moving into this stock. | 2006-11-24 | |
| HOLD | 42.900 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | At this price it’s a steal for its parent, Royal Dutch, which is acquiring it. Expect they will have to ante up a little higher price. | 2006-11-10 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 42.990 | Peter Gibson | (A Top Pick Sept 20/05. Up 6.1%.) Not his first pick in oils anymore. | 2006-11-03 | |
|
| |||||
| HOLD | 42.800 | Norman Levine | The parent, Royal Dutch Shell, has offered to buy the outstanding shares. Feels they will have to sweeten the offer. | 2006-10-31 | |
| HOLD | 42.550 | Rob Callander | Royal Dutch Shell has offered to buy the balance of the Company. Speculators and professionals are speculating that the offer will be increased, so if you own, hold on. | 2006-10-23 | |
| DON'T BUY | 32.330 | David Burrows | Long-term energy is probably a very good place to be. His strategy does not allow to set through long dips. Things that energy stocks will probably underperform for a little while. | 2006-10-19 | |
| TOP PICK | 32.080 | Brian Acker, CA | An unbelievable opportunity. He has a model price of $41 which is a positive 27% differential. You downside would be $30. | 2006-10-17 | |
| BUY | 30.600 | David Cockfield | Have some good reserves. They are in the tar sands. A good one for long-term investors. | 2006-10-05 | |
| VAGUE | 31.350 | Joseph Schachter | Shell's stock has been hammered. Shell has good assets and good management. It is a large cap company and will be around for a while. | 2006-09-29 | |
| BUY | 31.790 | David Baskin | Believes that this stock(Shell) is safer than Petro. But, Imperial Oil is less volatile and has more dividends. Believes that all three companyies are okay. | 2006-09-28 | |
| VAGUE | 30.550 | Paul Harris, CFA | Great company, well run with great operators. Hurt by the oil and gas industry. In 12 to 24 months should be higher then it is now. | 2006-09-26 | |
| DON'T BUY | 36.850 | Chris Smith | Their results have not been as good as some of the other integrated players, but not an expensive stock. Certainly defensive in this type of volatile market. People are probably concerned about their participation in the oil sands projects they are involved in and they are clearly going to have to spend a lot more money to execute these projects. | 2006-08-28 | |
| BUY on WEAKNESS | 38.050 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Doesn't get a lot of attention and it may be because Royal Dutch owns 73%. Likes their Athabascan project. Good production and very expandable and they are going to spend more capital there. Buy a little on weakness and tuck it away. | 2006-08-23 | |
| HOLD | 38.330 | John Stephenson | Little more expensive than others and has a premium because of its oil sands exposure. Would prefer in the low $30’s or high $20’s. | 2006-08-21 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 38.270 | Peter Gibson | (A Top Pick Aug 5/05. Down 3.2%.) Valuation looks pretty good. Sourcing of the profit growth looks pretty good. ROE is deteriorating. Sold his holdings. | 2006-08-18 | |
| DON'T BUY | 40.200 | Brian Acker, CA | Model price is $39.07 which is a -1% differential. Made his money on this company and moved on back in October. Dead money going forwards. | 2006-08-02 | |
| DON'T BUY | 38.630 | David Baskin | They are blowing their brains out on the costs of their oil sands project. This is why they have under performed the rest of the market. Prefers others. | 2006-07-27 | |
| DON'T BUY | 40.200 | Bill Carrigan | The upward trend line was violated in April. Once you break a trend line, the Up is over. | 2006-07-17 | |
| HOLD | 40.730 | David Cockfield | A great company. Multiple is a little high. Good mix of product. | 2006-07-13 | |
| BUY | 40.860 | David Burrows | The way oil stocks came off their lows in May has been very impressive. Also crude oil has acted very impressively. Feels there is another leg higher. | 2006-07-12 | |
| DON'T BUY | 40.490 | Norman Levine | In the integrateds in Canada, this is the weakest company. Costs have gone out of control on their oil sands project. When gasoline margins were sky-high, they had problems with their Montréal refinery. | 2006-07-11 | |
| WEAK BUY | 40.460 | Gordon Higgins, CA, MBA | Not going anywhere because there is no news to drive the stock. Nothing wrong with this company. | 2006-06-07 | |
| WEAK BUY | 38.130 | John Stephenson | If you're looking for a large cap name that is integrated, he would suggest Imperial Oil (IMO-T) or Petro Canada (PCA-T). Nothing wrong with it, it just has a higher valuation than any of them. | 2006-05-19 | |
|
| |||||
| DON'T BUY | 41.950 | David Burrows | A great company. He looks for companies that make higher highs in each successive leg of the bull market. This hasn't happened with this company. | 2006-04-28 | |
| BUY | 44.010 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Their largest play is the Athabascan oil play. Have brought production costs down to $22/23 a barrel. No debt and very strong balance sheet. Has fairly high valuation, but there are good reasons for it. | 2006-04-13 | |
| WEAK BUY | 41.800 | Gordon Higgins, CA, MBA | Affiliated with some of the oil sands. Has good prospects. Has had a good run. A little more pricey. Prefers CNQ (CNQ-T), Talisman (TLM-T) or Petro Canada (PCA-T). | 2006-04-05 | |
| SELL | 38.150 | David Burrows | Not at good stock to add at this point. Sell. | 2006-02-27 | |
| SELL | 40.620 | Norman Levine | He would be switching from this to Imperial Oil (IMO-T). It got a lot of momentum behind it because of its oil sands and a possible takeover by its parent. This has now become overpriced. | 2006-02-13 | |
| BUY on WEAKNESS | 42.500 | Brad Willock | The oil sands is the best natural asset in the world. As a long-term hold and a way to keep some holdings in the oil sands, this is a good company to have. May be a little rich at this point. | 2006-02-09 | |
| WATCH | 44.850 | Ross Healy | Has a fair amount of upside potential. Fair market value of about $100. Running into some technical resistance around the $46/47 area and is having a tough time pushing through. If it can get through, you could see a decent run. | 2006-02-06 | |
| BUY | 44.310 | Norman Levine | Just reported earnings and they are pretty much in line. Their production was above expectations but their earnings and refining and marketing were lower than expected. If you want to be in the oil business and just in Canada, this is a good stock. | 2006-01-25 | |
| HOLD | 46.900 | Wilf Gobert | Integrated oils give a bit of downside protection. This is one of the oil sands companies and their production is going to double or triple if their game plan stays in force over the next 10 years. Has a tremendous dividend growth record. Prefers Petro Canada. | 2006-01-23 | |
| DON'T BUY | 43.470 | Brian Acker, CA | He sold his holdings about a week ago when it reached his model price of $41.01. That’s a negative 6% differential from the current price. Would buy again at $36. | 2006-01-17 | |
| BUY | 40.700 | David Burrows | A great proxy on the energy business. You could own this without a lot of risk. | 2006-01-04 | |
| BUY | 37.900 | Brendan Kyne | A good conservative, low volatility way of playing the energy sector. A good bet. Won’t go up as much as others, but you have the sweetener of a possible consolidation in with its parent. | 2005-12-14 | |
| BUY | 34.910 | Bruce Campbell | Of senior gassy stocks, he owns Encana (ECA-T) instead, which he thinks has a better growth profile with a little more focus. There's nothing wrong with this one. | 2005-11-21 | |
| BUY | 34.410 | Michael Smedley | Has a tremendous project going on. | 2005-11-18 | |
| WEAK BUY | 35.760 | Ian Nakamoto | A fine company, but would prefer someting like a Petro Canada (PCA-T) which is quite a bit cheaper. | 2005-11-02 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 32.880 | Gavin Graham | (A Top Pick Aug 8/05. Down 15%.) One of the better managed and more conservative plays. A pretty good buying opportunity now. | 2005-10-31 | |
| WEAK BUY | 32.990 | Brian Acker, CA | The good news is that it is now underneath his model price of $38.41 which is a 10% differential. There are other picks he would value more. If it got down to $26 it would be a great buy. | 2005-10-20 | |
| DON'T BUY | 35.460 | David Cockfield | Thinks it's got ahead of itself. There was a lot of US buying and expects there will be more profit taking by them. | 2005-10-12 | |
| BUY | 35.460 | Bruce Campbell | Tends to be the most ignored of the seniors. Not well followed on the street. Although he has other preferences, he would have no problem buying it here. | 2005-10-12 | |
| HOLD | 39.920 | Bill MacLachlan | A very solid company and very well managed. Has great assets with great profits from the refining side. Prefers Encana (ECA-T). | 2005-09-23 | |
|
| |||||
| DON'T BUY | 40.250 | James Cole, BA, CFA | A great business and they keep their production completely unhedged. Own 60% of the Athabaskan oil sands project. A high standard of corporate governance. Any downward fluctuation in oil price could create an enormous risk. | 2005-09-22 | |
| DON'T BUY | 40.810 | Brian Acker, CA | Getting very expensive in terms of valuation. His model price is $38. | 2005-09-21 | |
| TOP PICK | 40.520 | Peter Gibson | Has been a bit of a laggard but is now showing growth in profitability. | 2005-09-20 | |
| BUY | 37.750 | Laura Wallace | Has lagged some of the others in part because the refinery and gasoline operations are a bigger percentage of its overall mix. Its latest quarterly earnings were a little bit disappointing particularily on the cost side, not making the productivity improvements that the market had hoped for. | 2005-08-24 | |
| BUY on WEAKNESS | 36.490 | David Cockfield | Has some very good properties. The cash flow in the latter part of '05 and into '06 looks very good. Got a little ahead of itself in terms of the multiples and it looks like there is some profit happening now. Look at buying in the $33/34 range. Looks a little expensive compared to its peers. | 2005-08-18 | |
| WEAK BUY | 36.500 | Peter Brieger | If he was going to own one of the integrateds with oil sands exposure, it would be this one. Prefers the more pure plays. | 2005-08-17 | |
| BUY | 38.100 | Norman Levine | Everyone should be in some energy stocks and this one is as good as any. Well run and good assets. | 2005-08-15 | |
| WEAK BUY | 39.600 | Gordon Higgins, CA, MBA | One of the few companies that has negative debt, ie, they have more cash than they do debt. Gives you a play on the oil sands. Along with a lot of the other oil sands stocks, it's had a good run. | 2005-08-11 | |
| TOP PICK | 39.170 | Gavin Graham | A 0.9% yield. This is the one big multi-national company that, because it had to write down its reserves by 20% last year, it is out there aggessively expanding its resource space. Has the oil sands. | 2005-08-08 | |
| TOP PICK | 39.170 | Peter Gibson | Just recently its profitability started to pick up again. A later cycle petro chemical stock. ROE level is around 23%. | 2005-08-05 | |
| BUY | 35.150 | David Cockfield | On a multiple basis has gotten ahead of some of the other big integrateds. Probably having a rest here. Has good long term potential. | 2005-07-22 | |
| HOLD | 35.060 | Michael Smedley | An extremely high quality, particularily in the oil sands. | 2005-07-20 | |
| WAIT | 34.730 | Bruce Campbell | Like a lot of other senior oils, it has downside because of price risk. Will follow the price of oil in the short term. | 2005-07-14 | |
| BUY on WEAKNESS | 33.980 | Ron Meisels | Along with all the oils, this stock has done very well. Recently it had a direct run from $27 to $34 and that needs a correction. If it comes back to about $31, it will be a great buying opportunity. | 2005-07-07 | |
| BUY on WEAKNESS | 34.240 | James Cole, BA, CFA | Have re-energized themselves in the last number of years and have grown substantially. Very supportive of the oil sands company which he expects will be expanded significantly. Would like to add on any pullbacks. | 2005-07-06 | |
| DON'T BUY | 33.430 | David Baskin | One of the less attractive of the oil companies. The integrated oils for conservative investors are a lot safer than the explorers. Prefers Imperial Oil (IMO-T). | 2005-06-23 | |
| BUY | 31.860 | John Stephenson | A good company, but trading a little bit on the rich side. Have had a few problems with their own oil sands, in terms of the cost side. Not cheap at UPS multiple on a forward basis of 11.7 and 6.1 X EBITDA which is well above their conventional peer group. Doesn't see a tremendous catalyst for growth. | 2005-06-21 | |
| HOLD | 95.510 | David Cockfield | May run a little bit here. Feels a little more positive on others based on their multiples. | 2005-06-15 | |
| HOLD | 85.450 | Michael Smedley | Along with the Suncor (SU-T) assets in the oil sands, it's the highest quality in that territory. | 2005-05-25 | |
| HOLD | 85.650 | David Taylor, MBA, CFA | A great hold. Prefers Petro Canada (PCA-T). | 2005-04-25 | |
|
| |||||
| TOP PICK | 82.250 | Mark Jackson, CFA | Started raising some money out of their junior oils at the end of last year with the big rup up they had, but still wanted some exposure so started looking at the integrateds. This one was cheap to its NAV and earnings, had some upside and still had exposure to the oil sands. Little price risk to the movement in oil price. | 2005-04-13 | |
| HOLD | 88.050 | John Sinkins, CFA | Heavily correlated with what's going to go on with the oil price. A little pricey at this point. This one would really be a call on what you think will happen with oil. | 2005-04-04 | |
| BUY on WEAKNESS | 90.670 | Matt Baillie | Has had a very high return on equity historically. Has some nice recent gas finds. Has a huge oil sands play. Looks a little rich. Very well run company. | 2005-03-16 | |
| BUY | 64.400 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Good copany in the heavy oil sands. | 2004-08-25 | |
| HOLD | 61.010 | Ross Healy | Ran into a meat grinder in terms of their earnings in the 4th quarter but fair market value is well above current price. Would prefer a purer play at this time. | 2004-02-23 | |
| HOLD | 60.800 | Michael Sprung | Expensive. Higher PE. Book value is $20. | 2004-02-09 | |
| BUY | 53.500 | Michael Sprung | Their new venture will serve them well. Hasn't had the run up that others have had. | 2003-06-12 | |
| BUY | 51.000 | Mark Jackson, CFA | Once debt is paid down, dividends may be increased. | 2003-06-10 | |
| BUY | 51.000 | Nereo Piticco | Positive on energy. Well run. Thinly traded. | 2003-06-10 | |
| BUY | 50.750 | Michael Smedley | Has just broken through $50. Good potential in the McKenzie area. | 2003-05-23 | |
| BUY | 57.600 | David Driscoll | The integrated "long term" returns avaerage about 8%. Safer than exploration/development. | 2002-04-03 | |
| DON'T BUY | 58.300 | Joe Connolly | Oil is only at this temporary high because of the middle east which has made this stock too expensive. | 2002-04-02 | |
| BUY | 57.700 | Glenn Paradis, BA, CFA | Likes integrated oils. Does better in the oil/gas cycles than exploration. | 2002-04-01 | |
| TOP PICK | 53.000 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Has a good heavy oil development in Fort McMurray. Great future. | 2002-03-13 | |
| DON'T BUY | 53.500 | Martin Hubbes, CFA | Had a good run, but expects it will slow down now. Prefers Petro Canada which is cheaper. | 2002-03-06 | |
| BUY | 45.110 | Peter Brieger | Good exposure to oil sands. | 2002-01-04 | |
| BUY | 42.400 | Ross Healy | Oil prices have been built into the stock. If oil stays at $25 level, earnings will increase the share price. | 2001-10-24 | |
| BUY | 40.750 | Mark Jackson, CFA | Has exposure to oil sands. 2% dividend yield. | 2001-10-09 | |
| BUY | 33.430 | Mark Jackson, CFA | Likes the levels at the current price. Had a 3 for 1 split recently. Still sees upside from new production. Likes their Athabaskan oil sands assets. Likes it in the $35/40 range. | 2001-08-27 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 41.990 | Ross Healy | (Was a top pick on Mar 21/01 no change) Still likes. Good mngmnt. Could go to $60. | 2001-08-22 | |
|
| |||||
| WEAK BUY | 45.620 | Laura Wallace | Likes integrated, but this is not her first choice. | 2001-06-08 |