Click Here to
receive daily
reports of the
TOP PICKS
OR
your personal
stock choices

STOCKCHASE

What the experts are saying!
This site compiles comments that experts make about stocks while on public TV shows.

There are 5 registered members and 67 guests viewing the site. Follow us on Twitter Rss Top Picks FeedRss Daily Feed

Merck & Company
Symbol: MRK-N
Active: Y
Sector: biotechnology/pharmaceutical
Last Price: 37.910
Last Price Date: 2012-02-11 01:14:13
Globe 200 day average
Google Discussions (view only)
Yahoo Discussions (participate)

Experts who have talked about Merck & Company

PAST TOP PICK38.150Brian Acker, CA(Top Pick Feb 17/11, Up 21.55%) Still likes it.2012-02-09
DON'T BUY38.400John ZechnerStill relatively inexpensive. They are in restrained growth at this point. Has come off recently because all of the pharmas had a pretty strong year last year and people are shifting into the more resource stocks. It's a defensive stock so there is slower growth.2012-02-06
BUY38.630Mike S. Newton, CIM FCSIPharma: The trend is really looking quite good. Hasn’t looked at Merck in a while. There was a time when it was 0% return for 10 years. Now, it is in the right sector and it is moving.2012-02-01
PAST TOP PICK38.340Brian Acker, CA(A TOP PICK Feb 17/11. Up 21.17%.) Still likes but doesn't see as much upside this year.2012-01-04
BUY31.200Barry SchwartzAn attractive buy. He prefers Abbott Labs (ABT-N), which has growing earnings and is diversified into other products such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and nutritionals. Terrific dividend. Starting to get attention from value investors.2011-08-11
DON'T BUY34.930Gordon ReidBit of a poster boy for the whole pharma industry. Something like a leaky boat in that you are rowing and making progress, but constantly bailing. Because of patent expiration, it is very difficult for these companies to create a growth profile.2011-07-28
Comment35.180David BaskinHas started buying into this sector on the ones that are trading at 10X multiples.2011-06-16
TOP PICK36.390Brian Acker, CAModel price is $50.75, a 40% upside. Came up 8%-10% in the last couple of weeks, but still has a long ways to go. 4.2% dividend.2011-05-06
TOP PICK33.100Brian Acker, CAMarket was very disappointed in their earnings. Trading at less than 9X earnings. Yield of 4.61%. The model price is $50.15, a 52% upside. It is now all about cost control with these companies. There is huge consolidation in the industry.2011-02-17
WAIT33.910Ara NalbandianRecently dropped because they dropped trials of a blood thinner, one of the biggest products in their pipeline. He doesn’t know if this means there will be no sales from this product. He would look seriously at it if it based out at this level. He likes this one and it is reasonable at these levels. He has a small position and is looking to accumulate.2011-01-19
DON'T BUY35.400Don LatoTrades at a good multiple but prefers Abbott Labs (ABT-N) because of their pipeline. Growth estimates are only 6%-7% a year.2010-12-08
DON'T BUY37.150Don LatoFine company and reasonably valued but not as cheap as others that he owns. Decent dividend but not anything he would rush into. Still a little uncertainty over the healthcare sector and particularly with this one's pipeline area. Consider Abbott Labs (ABT-N), which has more growth potential.2010-10-14
Comment36.430Stan WongTook over Schering-Plough in 2009, which expanded their pipeline of pharmaceuticals, drugs, etc. Pays about 4% yield so likes it from an income standpoint. With a 40% payout ratio dividend is relatively safe. Might not give you growth that you would like. If you think economy is going to grind higher, health care is not a sector to be in.2010-09-16
PAST TOP PICK36.510Ara Nalbandian(A Top Pick Aug 19/09. Up 15.9%.) Merged with Schering-Plough and the combination produced a pipeline that is incomparable in the Pharma sector. Will have sustainable growth for many years to come.2010-09-15
PAST TOP PICK35.420Ara Nalbandian(A Top Pick May 15/09. Up 46.13%.) (Think this should be Aug 19 and up 12.2%, not May 15 as BNN shows. Bill) Starting to trim out of this one.2010-06-23
DON'T BUY35.860Stan Wong3rd largest pharmaceutical behind Johnson & Johnson (JNJ-N) and Pfizer (PFE-N). We are in an economic recovery and if this continues and there is no double dip, health-care stocks and consumer staples won't necessarily be your best performers.2010-06-17
DON'T BUY38.500Don LatoPfizer (PFE-N) and Merck (MRK-N) are pretty fully priced at current levels. Growth prospects are not that great, especially with a lot of drugs coming off patent. Multiple looks attractive and dividend looks okay but there are better places to go in pharmaceuticals. Prefers Abbott Labs (ABT-N).2010-03-23
BUY39.540Mike S. Newton, CIM FCSILarge-cap pharmaceuticals are probably the best valuation out there. Their recent merger is all done. An excellent buy at this level.2010-02-02
DON'T BUY38.930Gordon ReidPatent expirations is a problem with all Pharma plays and pure pharmaceuticals are in a difficult position.2010-01-13
Comment31.650Steven ConvilleDividend of around 5%. Cash rich so not concerned about a short-term cash burn. The rate of drugs that big pharma can bring to market is slowing down. Could be $36 in 12 months but if you're not happy with that you should look elsewhere.2009-10-02
SELL31.630Charles LannonFinalizing the merger with Schering-Plough (SGP-N). Good dividend yield and low PE ratio, which is a value trap because of huge headwinds ahead of them as drugs go off patent protection. Growth will be difficult. Prefers Johnson & Johnson (JNJ-N) because of the medical devices and consumer healthcare. Also Abbott Labs (ABT-N) would be another consideration.2009-09-30
Comment30.700Andrew Guy, CFAPharmaceutical. More disciplined approach so they've been generating very strong free cash flow. A couple of their strong drugs will be coming off patent in a couple of years. In the process of merging with Schering-Plough (SGP-N). If you were going to pick a name, he would prefer Abbott (ABT-N). 5% dividend yield.2009-09-04
TOP PICK31.480Ara NalbandianMerging with Schering-Plough (SGP-N). Combination will create a very strong pipeline of products, which for many years will have a good growth profile. It will merge short to mid cycle products with longer-term type products and thinks there are significant synergy type benefits. You could also own Schering-Plough, which is a discounted way of playing this. (See also SGP-N.)2009-08-19
DON'T BUY23.450Michael YoshikamiHas opportunities as a defensive stock. There is significant government regulation coming. There will likely be price controls. There is some risk. Might buy for the dividend.2009-04-24
BUY26.550Norman LevinePrefers Pfizer (PFE-N) even though in the near term this company has outperformed them. If you are looking to own a pharmaceutical, this is a fine name.2009-03-30
DON'T BUY50.120Brian Acker, CAModel price is $48.07, a negative 7.5% differential.2007-07-27
PAST TOP PICK44.290David Burrows(A Top Pick Sept 13/06. Up 7.3%.) Pharmaceutical stocks fit in the theme of large cap capital growth. Expect this to be a good stock this year without a lot of risk.2007-01-08
TOP PICK44.490David BurrowsThe company went through a lot of bad news over the last four months but in the last 3 quarters there has been a re-acceleration in their growth rate. Trades at a very reasonable multiple.2006-10-19
WEAK BUY43.760John ZechnerLikes the sector. The names have been incredibly punished in the last few years. They still look cheap. This one had additional problems with Viox, but is recovering nicely. Wouldn't be his first pick.2006-10-16
BUY39.270Norman LevineAll the major drug stocks are starting to act better. In this type of market, money moves from risky stocks to defensive stocks. A good place to be.2006-07-25
BUY33.490David Taylor, MBA, CFAGreat dividend yield. Probably one of the worst performing sectors in the S&P. Lots of cost cutting opportunities. Trading at around 8/9 X earnings. Pristine balance sheet.2006-06-14
DON'T BUY34.600Norman LevinePrefers Pfizer which has been doing more things correctly.2006-04-27
HOLD36.200David BurrowsThis is a sector that he has avoided as they have had three years of poor experience. In the last 3/4 months, pharmaceuticals have started to wake up. This will not be the fastest growing area and this one will plod along.2006-03-23
BUY33.820Jim O'ShaughnessyBig pharmas have had a really tough go. He can now see them coming back. A good selection for a conservative, patient investor.2006-02-02
DON'T BUY32.780Bruce CampbellHas a lot of lawsuits overhanging it. Would not own it at this point.2006-01-24
PAST TOP PICK31.990David Taylor, MBA, CFA(A Top Pick Aug 29/05. Up 14%.) Loves this name. An absolute steal. Facing class action lawsuits. This is what a value manager wants. A great company with a ton of free cash flow, strong dividend, pristine balance sheet and everybody hates.2005-12-20
DON'T BUY28.900Ross HealyToo early, particularly if the US has a recession. If we get into a recession, it will be a consumer led recession, there’s going to be humongous pressures by consumers and seniors on drugs for some of the egregious profits they have been making.2005-12-13
DON'T BUY27.600James Cole, BA, CFADrug stars such as Pfizer (PFE-N) Merck (MRK-N), etc. are attractively valued but are clearly out of favour. They have great long term track records and are in strong financial positions, however, there is a lack of predictability regarding the science. Doesn't like the cash flow dynamics where they spend billions up front with no sure win ahead. Litigation risks.2005-09-22
BUY29.190Brian Acker, CAPays a 5.5% dividend. If you have good fundamentals plus a dividend yield, you should do OK.2005-09-07
DON'T BUY28.230Brad WillockHas a pretty decent pipeline of new products. Current dividend yield is very high. You have to be prepared to ride out the storm of litigations, but could come out nicely. Very risky.2005-08-31
TOP PICK28.290David Taylor, MBA, CFAUp to their necks in litigation. They've lost $30 billion in market cap because an anti-inflammatory has been pulled off the shelf due to heart attack risks. Just lost a $230 million lawsuit which will be reversed on appeal. Only trading at 9 X earnings. Have a ton of cash and generate a ton of free cash flow. 5.5% dividend yield. Very cheap.2005-08-29
DON'T BUY34.420David BurrowsPharmaceutical sector did very poorly over the last 2 years, but deceleration in revenue growth has slowed and profitability has started to improve. Look for the strongest perfoming stock in the sector. As Eli Lilly (LLY-N) is performing better, that would be the better of the 2, but would suggest you look at Sanofi-Aventis (SNY-N) which is close to new highs and Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA-Q) in generics.2005-05-03
BUY33.920David Taylor, MBA, CFAPharmaceutical stocks in the US have been absolutely decimated. Dirt cheap. Generates a ton of free cash flow.2005-04-25
BUY31.760Paul Harris, CFAAn equally good stock as Pfizer (PFE-N) at these levels. 4.5% yield. Always have good products. Going through a difficult spell right now.2005-03-28
BUY31.210Brian Acker, CAGreat valuation and a good entry point.2005-02-22
DON'T BUY32.610Andrew McCreathWould prefer Pfizer (PFE-N) which has a far superior pipeline.2005-02-18
BUY29.850Paul Harris, CFABig issue has been VIOXX. Very convoluted over the near term as to what will happen. Don't know what the legal issues will be. There could be more bad news from previous users of the drug. Have lots of money. Trades at almost 20% discount to the peer group. Nearly 5% yield. Has room for upside. Won't be an easy road.2005-01-24
WEAK BUY31.300Brian Acker, CAThinks it's going to be very tough to legally get this company with VIOXX. They have it as the 11th position in their portfolio. Model price is $38. Prefers Pfizer which has a bigger upside.2005-01-18
WEAK BUY31.790Paul Harris, CFAFeels they should have re-labelled rather than pulling Vioxx so that people would know how to use them properly. A huge number of lawsuits they could face down the road. Didn't grow by acquisition, so their pipeline looks a bit murky. A great company and will be around for a long time.2004-12-16
DON'T BUY28.740David BurrowsCompanies like Pfizer and Merck have been coming apart for quite awhile. Growth rate has gone from 30% to low single digits. When this happens, the P/E has to contract. There are more sellers than buyers. One of the few that is doing better is Schering AG. Growth rate is accelerating and have a good line up of drugs.2004-12-10
DON'T BUY27.720Ross HealyFacing a large number of large and messy law suits.2004-12-01
WEAK BUY27.720Brian Acker, CAMispriced. Expects that down the road Vioxx will come back.2004-11-30
DON'T BUY27.670Norman LevineA cockroach company with one problem after another coming out of the woodwork.2004-11-29
DON'T BUY27.480Ron MeiselsIn 2002, 2003 and early 2004 the chart looked like it was going to hold, but then collapsed. A broken down stock. Usually takes a significant amount of time for the news to be absorbed.2004-11-16
DON'T BUY26.150Bob StodgellMore aggressive than what they would want. A number of outstanding issues regarding litigation would keep the top executives eyes off running the business. Prefers Pfizer.2004-11-11
DON'T BUY26.410Brad WillockMarket is pricing in $20/25 million for class action law suits, but it could be more. Would need a tremendous amount of earnings growth to reach what people are expecting and this is unlikeley. High dividend yield. No longer a safe story.2004-11-10
PAST TOP PICK27.870Ray Steele(A Top Pick July 12/04. Down 40%.) Sold out before the big drop.2004-11-03
BUY31.220John ZechnerPharmaceuticals are cheaper than he has ever seen them. Cheap. Trading at low multiples.2004-10-27
DON'T BUY30.190Glenn Paradis, BA, CFATook a tremendous hit with their withdrawal of Vioxx. Buying it now would be bottom fishing. A lot of issues going on in the pharma sector now. Weak pipeline.2004-10-14
DON'T BUY33.430Don ReedHas declined because of a recall of one of their drugs. Will probably have a bounce.2004-10-05
PAST TOP PICK45.770Bill Carrigan(A Top Pick Apr 28/04. Down 4%.) Had bought for the wrong reasons. Bought at the top of a cycle as a defensive play. Don't buy.2004-09-14
TOP PICK45.410Ray SteeleDividend yield is very attractive. You pay very little for the upside.2004-07-12
TOP PICK48.360Francis GannonYield is over 3%. Trading around 15 X next year's earnings.2004-06-18
TOP PICK47.440Bill CarriganThis late in the cycle, look for stocks that are large, overlooked and underowned. Had a low in 2002 and a higher low at the end of 2003 in a downtrend, still expects to see money going to this group.2004-04-28
WEAK BUY46.740Glenn Paradis, BA, CFAHave more patent issues than the majority of the big pharmas. Not a lot of catalysts. If you are a real long-term, patient investor, not a bad buy.2004-04-22
BUY46.500Norman LevineBig pharma stocks should do well in this market. Historically, they do well when rates start to move up.2004-04-21
DON'T BUY44.390Ron MeiselsStill under a major downtrend line. Trying to find a base.2004-03-17
TOP PICK48.080Francis GannonA quiet stock in that not many people are expecting much from them, 7/8% growth this year but you do get a nice 3%+ dividend yield while you wait. Trades at about 15 X earnings. Has a new cholesterol drug coming out this year.2004-02-27
BUY47.770Gavin GrahamHas had problems with patent expiry's and drugs in its channel. Gives a 3% dividend yield. Continues to like.2004-01-06
TOP PICK44.770Peter Arender, CFAtrading at significantly less than fair value. Bad news on drug development. Dividends at 3.3%2003-12-23
DON'T BUY43.070Brad WillockHave had tremendous issues. They had to stop production on a couple of drugs that were being tested. Virtually no revenue or earnings coming.2003-12-05
DON'T BUY43.630David BurrowsWhen the stock is not participating in a bull market, steer clear. A strong Company and well financed with good products but there is no real excitement. If the market rolls over, it would get hit hard.2003-12-03
BUY45.800John ZechnerLikes some of the major pharmaceuticals at these levels. Very cheap. Buy and hold.2003-11-13
STRONG BUY43.870Peter Arender, CFAA fantastic time to be buying this stock. If the pharmaceutical industry reverts to anything near normal, this is a huge screaming buy.2003-11-11
BUY43.600Gavin GrahamMissed its numbers. Demographics for drugs looks great. At a great price.2003-11-06
DON'T BUY50.680Brad WillockNot a fan. They don't have a very strong pipeline of promising drugs. Present drugs are facing competition from generics.2003-09-03
TOP PICK53.510Peter Arender, CFATrading at a significant discount.Has been getting left behind.2003-08-05
PAST TOP PICK57.890Laura Wallace(Was a top pick on May 21/03. Up 4.4%.) Still likes. Offers good value.2003-07-23
TOP PICK55.730John Sinkins, CFA2.5% dividend. Big name products. Only 14/15 X next years earnings. Recent studies suggest that some of their drugs may also be useful in preventing cancer.2003-06-02
TOP PICK55.380Laura WallaceTrading at 16 X earnings, yielding 2.6%. Great pipeline of new drugs. Great balance sheet.2003-05-21
BUY54.650Peter Arender, CFAGood price. Good earnings price momentum.2003-03-24
TOP PICK54.850Peter Arender, CFAHealth care sector is a good sector. 15/16 PE. Good price.2003-02-04
WEAK BUY58.250Glenn Paradis, BA, CFASome of their drugs have come off patent and they are having difficulty with Research /Development productivity. Prefers Pfizer.2003-01-02
TOP PICK46.950John Sinkins, CFAPharmaceuticals look good in any upturn. 3% dividend. Trading at 15 X earnings. Had no earnings growth this year.2002-10-02
BUY47.700Laura WallaceDemographics for pharmaceuticals is good. Could be volatile during their election period. Good long term.2002-09-25
BUY49.130Brian Acker, CALikes the valuations. Good balance sheet and good earnings.2002-09-04
BUY50.640Ray SteeleOutlook for drug companies is good. A bit expensve, but long term is good.2002-08-20
BUY53.200John ZechnerSector has been hit hard. At a good level. Prefers Pfizer.2002-06-06
PAST TOP PICK55.760John Sinkins, CFA(Was a top pick on Apr 4 up 1.5%) Still likes.2002-05-09
DON'T BUY56.520Michelle CalpinVery reasonable valuation. Patents are coming off. Prefers Pfizer.2002-04-22
DON'T BUY56.940Brad WillockFairly cheap. Dividend. Several drugs coming off patent.2002-04-19
BUY54.530Neil MurdockAt a 5 year low. Have some good products. At a good price.2002-04-15
WEAK BUY54.000David BaskinExpiring patents have created problems. Pipeline is not as strong as other pharmaceuticals, but the price is very cheap.2002-04-12
TOP PICK58.800John Sinkins, CFAOne of the cheapest in the drug sctor.2002-04-04
DON'T BUY62.500David DriscollLosing a lot of their patents with nothing new in the pipeline.2002-03-08
WEAK BUY61.420Brad WillockNo earnings growth this year. Should be some in 2003. At a good price. Prefers J&J or Pfizer.2002-02-22
DON'T BUY58.840Brian Acker, CABroke through a technical base. Generics are giving some tough competition.2002-01-30
DON'T BUY58.100Neil MurdockA lot of their drugs have come off patent without adequate replacement. Prefers Pfizer.2002-01-07
WAIT58.500Glenn Paradis, BA, CFACompetition. Pipeline is weak now. OK long term.2001-12-18
DON'T BUY66.990David BurrowsPharmaceuticals may be re-establishing themselves for market leadership. Prefers Lily and Abbot2001-12-10

Privacy Policy



Other worthy sites:

Powered by phpMyEdit of Platon Group
Life Insurance Canada - Canadian life insurance broker with online life insurance shopping.
American Universal Life Insurance
American term life insurance quotes
Canadian term life insurance rates
Our Main Page

www.financialwebring.com