| | |
| DON'T BUY | 4.750 | Charles Dillingham | One of the problems is a lot of debt and a high payout ratio. A huge portion of their assets is in Alberta and in the oil sands area. He would be careful on this one. | 2008-02-14 | |
| | |
| VAGUE | 5.250 | Charles Dillingham | Higher risk then most. | 2007-10-29 | |
| | |
| DON'T BUY | 5.100 | Dennis Mitchell, CFA | Focused on multi-residential.
Some development risk.
| 2007-06-29 | |
| | |
| HOLD | 5.500 | Dennis Mitchell, CFA | Multi-residential. Focused on secondary properties in western Canada. Highly levered to the oil sands. Over distributing, but can see this disappearing by the end of 2007. | 2007-04-03 | |
| | |
| BUY | 5.960 | Dennis Mitchell, CFA | Multi-residential. Has a lot of exposure to western Canada and 30 to 40% of the revenue comes from Fort McMurray. This area has almost zero vacancy. | 2007-01-19 | |
| | |
| WEAK BUY | 6.000 | Charles Dillingham | One of the most extreme of the western plays. High yield. Probably overpaying its distributions. He feels it will earn its income and it will be a safe investment. Quite a bit of debt. Potentially, Alberta has a lot of risks. | 2007-01-12 | |
| | |
| HOLD | 5.810 | Charles Dillingham | Sold his holdings at around $6. Heavily weighted to Alberta. Will revisit in January. Reasonable yield. | 2006-12-08 | |
| | |
| BUY | 5.690 | Dennis Mitchell, CFA | Multi-residential REIT. Heavy exposure to western Canada, particularly Fort McMurray. Started in 2005 with high yield and payout ratios well in excess of 100%. Management has increased free cash flow and reduced payout ratio to 150%. Buy for growth, not yield. | 2006-11-21 | |
| | |
| SELL | 5.610 | Ravi Sood | Doesn't like this one. Very risky given their capital structure and their strategy. | 2006-07-21 | |
Experts that have talked about Lanesborough REIT
Rss Top Picks Feed