| Click Here to receive daily reports of the TOP PICKS OR your personal stock choices | STOCKCHASEWhat the experts are saying! |
| There are 3 registered members and 52 guests viewing the site. | Follow us on Twitter | Rss Top Picks Feed | Rss Daily Feed |
|
| SELL | 23.970 | Peter Brieger | Shell Canada is offering to purchase all outstanding common shares. If you home, he would take the offer and reinvest in UTS Energy (UTS-T). | 2006-06-12 | |
| DON'T BUY | 17.930 | Bill Carrigan | Had a long uptrend and is now spiking. If you own, hold and enjoy the ride. | 2006-05-02 | |
| HOLD | 11.320 | Peter Brieger | This is an asset play, not a “price to cash flow” play. There are more interesting ways to play the heavy oil. | 2005-12-28 | |
| WEAK BUY | 10.470 | Wilf Gobert | Has not been a fan of this stock, but they are 100% oil and the higher the price of oil, the better their leverage. Relatively high production costs. Low quality oil so their price is $20 below the regular rate. Doesn't expect it will become an income trust for a long time as they have a very aggressive growth strategy which will require a lot of capital. | 2005-09-14 | |
| DON'T BUY | 10.220 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Heavy oil producer with most propertys located in the north east area of Alberta. Doesn't get the full value of crude oil. From $5 to $25 less. Netbacks are significantly lower then others. Good management. Not a heavy oil fan. | 2005-09-02 | |
| WEAK BUY | 10.500 | Bill Harris, CFA | Essentially heavy oil of the conventional type that he likes as well as other heavy oil. Asset value is around $8/9. Good management. Speculative. | 2005-08-25 | |
| DON'T BUY | 10.310 | Peter Brieger | A controversial stock. The bears are saying it's far too expensive on a price to cash flow basis and the stock is worth about $7. On the other hand, people are saying it is incredibly cheap on a price to book value and their target would be $14. He has no intention of owning it. | 2005-08-17 | |
| BUY | 9.950 | Bill Harris, CFA | Have a heavy oil property. Has a hunch that with the people behind this project, because of their track record, they'll figure out a way to make it work. Speculative and too risky for his clients. | 2005-07-08 | |
| HOLD | 9.820 | Peter Brieger | Sold his holdings at $6.50 because of price weakness in heavy oil. Also on a price to cash flow basis, the stock is expensive. However, if you sell on a nest asset value basis, that would be close to $20. | 2005-06-29 | |
| DON'T BUY | 9.720 | David Cockfield | A heavy oil producer with excellent properties, but too expensive. Really a $7/8 stock. Their record of bringing production on hasn't been great. | 2005-06-15 | |
| DON'T BUY | 7.760 | Peter Brieger | Bought at $5 and sold at $6.40. Sold because of the contradictory information being given. On a price to cash flow basis, it is very expensive. Some believe that in the short term, the net asset value is about $12 and closer to $20 longer term and the stock should sell between $12 and $20. Not a believer in buying on net asset value. | 2005-05-18 | |
| WAIT | 8.500 | David Cockfield | Has been negative on this one for some time. Has some reasonable assets, but it became overpriced and overpromoted. Have had some production problems in bringing production on. It's a heavy oil company. If the stock got down to $6 it would represent a better value. | 2005-05-12 | |
| BUY | 11.950 | Fred Pynn | Capital intensive. A discovery however may be years before they discover profits from discovery. | 2005-03-03 | |
| DON'T BUY | 9.590 | David Cockfield | Has had a heck of a good run. Heavy oil. Has lots of drilling to do. Fully priced. Prefers others. | 2005-02-21 | |
| VAGUE | 9.160 | Peter Brieger | Did own, but sold as there was a wide diversity on the stock. Analysts basing it on Price to Cash Flow felt it was grossly overpriced, while the ones that based it on a net asset value felt it was undervalued. You pick. | 2005-01-27 | |
| BUY | 7.350 | Peter Brieger | Likes the company very much. Sold at around $6.65. Has some great reserves behind it. The analytical group at First Energy is convinced the stock is worth close to $12. Considering buying it again. | 2004-12-31 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 6.760 | Peter Brieger | (A Top Pick July 5/04. Down 8%.) Sold at a profit. Likes the story, but too many people say it's too expensive on a price to cash flow basis. | 2004-09-29 | |
| HOLD | 6.300 | Peter Brieger | (A previous Top Pick at $5.05. Sold for a profit.) Market felt that on a price to cash flow basis it was expensive. First rate company and management. | 2004-09-15 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 6.610 | Peter Brieger | (A Top Pick July 5/04. Then: $7.40) The price is going down and stock is cheap. | 2004-09-02 | |
|
| |||||
| SELL | 6.920 | Peter Linder | A very expensive stock. 100% heavy oil. | 2004-08-19 | |
| HOLD | 7.020 | Peter Brieger | It is stagnating at $7 because of an element on the street that says it is overpriced. However, on a net asset value looking out over 2/3 years, the NAV could be as high as $20 with a potential $12 share price. | 2004-08-18 | |
| PAST TOP PICK | 7.160 | Peter Brieger | (Past top pick July 5/04. No change.) Still likes. Has a buy target of $6.50. | 2004-08-04 | |
| TOP PICK | 7.400 | Peter Brieger | (Past top pick Apr 14/04. Up 27%.) Expensive on a cash flow basis, but on an asset value is worth between $12/20. Good properties. Would buy more at $6.50. | 2004-07-05 | |
| TOP PICK | 7.450 | Peter Brieger | Looking for cash flows of $1/1.50. Sees the stock going to its net asset value of $12/12.50. Some good heavy oil properties. | 2004-06-17 | |
| BUY | 7.120 | Bill Harris, CFA | Management has had great success with it. A heavy oil play in northern Alberta. A phenomenal asset. Incredibly low cost. Very profitable. | 2004-06-04 | |
| DON'T BUY | 7.120 | David Cockfield | Has had a fantastic run, but thinks it's way overpriced by 25/30%. Has quite a bit of downside. | 2004-06-04 | |
| TOP PICK | 7.900 | Peter Brieger | Debt free and strong management. Present heavy oil property recovery rate is 12 and could go as high as 20 | 2004-05-04 | |
| TOP PICK | 5.700 | Peter Brieger | (A past top pick Mar 16/04. Up 4%.) Expects the cash flow will quadruple in the next 4 years. Very cheap stock. | 2004-04-14 | |
| TOP PICK | 5.390 | Peter Brieger | A way to play the oil, it's heavy oil. 6000 barrels a day through pipelines. Debt free. | 2004-03-31 | |
| TOP PICK | 5.430 | Peter Brieger | Will probably quadruple production in each of the next five years. Cash flow will probably go from $.62 to two $1.30. No debt. | 2004-03-16 | |
| WEAK BUY | 4.350 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Has some excellent properties. Good growth in its production. Has steered clear of heavy oil because of its element of risk. | 2003-12-18 | |
| WEAK BUY | 3.020 | Lou Schizas | Up 27% year-to-date. Last quarterly report was not as good as previous ones. A new development looks promising in including a pipeline. Volume has thinned out. Has resistance at $3.10. If it can break through that, it should have more upside. | 2003-08-28 | |
| DON'T BUY | 2.350 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | A heavy oil producer. Would wait until asphalt season is over. Buy in the fall. | 2003-02-05 | |
| DON'T BUY | 1.100 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Better places to invest. | 2001-06-06 | |
| DON'T BUY | 1.010 | Glenn MacNeill, P.Eng. | Has good backing. Costs are very high toget at heavy oil. | 2001-05-09 |